<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" encoding="UTF-8" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:googleplay="http://www.google.com/schemas/play-podcasts/1.0" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:fireside="http://fireside.fm/modules/rss/fireside">
  <channel>
    <fireside:hostname>web02.fireside.fm</fireside:hostname>
    <fireside:genDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2026 18:22:52 -0500</fireside:genDate>
    <generator>Fireside (https://fireside.fm)</generator>
    <title>The It's Innate! Podcast - Episodes Tagged with “Sociomoral Evaluation”</title>
    <link>https://itsinnate.fireside.fm/tags/sociomoral%20evaluation</link>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2023 23:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
    <description>Two opinionated developmental cognitive scientists wax theoretical about how infants and children acquire knowledge!
</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type>
    <itunes:subtitle>A podcast by two developmental cognitive scientists</itunes:subtitle>
    <itunes:author>Deon Benton &amp; Jenny Wang</itunes:author>
    <itunes:summary>Two opinionated developmental cognitive scientists wax theoretical about how infants and children acquire knowledge!
</itunes:summary>
    <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/e/e7d55467-26ad-4d13-aa3b-ffe8a883b0bb/cover.jpg?v=1"/>
    <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
    <itunes:owner>
      <itunes:name>Deon Benton &amp; Jenny Wang</itunes:name>
      <itunes:email>theitsinnatepodcast@gmail.com</itunes:email>
    </itunes:owner>
<itunes:category text="Education"/>
<itunes:category text="Science">
  <itunes:category text="Social Sciences"/>
</itunes:category>
<itunes:category text="Society &amp; Culture">
  <itunes:category text="Philosophy"/>
</itunes:category>
<item>
  <title>Episode 4: What's morals got to do with it?</title>
  <link>https://itsinnate.fireside.fm/4</link>
  <guid isPermaLink="false">c418f779-64a9-4d89-b6df-21e5cfa7c8bd</guid>
  <pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2023 23:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
  <author>Deon Benton &amp; Jenny Wang</author>
  <enclosure url="https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/e7d55467-26ad-4d13-aa3b-ffe8a883b0bb/c418f779-64a9-4d89-b6df-21e5cfa7c8bd.mp3" length="100648704" type="audio/mpeg"/>
  <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
  <itunes:author>Deon Benton &amp; Jenny Wang</itunes:author>
  <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
  <itunes:duration>1:44:50</itunes:duration>
  <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
  <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/e/e7d55467-26ad-4d13-aa3b-ffe8a883b0bb/cover.jpg?v=1"/>
  <description>Candy and Deon begin the episode by discussing their respective plans for teaching this fall. Specifically, they discuss whether they'll be teaching fully in person, fully remotely, or some combination of both. Note that since recording this episode, Deon has decided that he'll teach fully remotely—in the episode he was leaning toward a hyflex approach. In second segment, Candy and Deon discuss Kiley Hamlin's classic study on infants' developing sociomoral evaluations as well as a recent replication attempt of the original study by Schlingloff, Csibra, and Tatone (2007). Candy and Deon also discuss whether the data reported in either the original study or replication attempt support the claim that infants possess a "innate moral core" (Hamlin, 2013). And in an episode first Candace and Deon actually disagree about something! Does this spell the end for this nascent podcast? 
Links 
Hamlin, J. K., Wynn, K., &amp;amp; Bloom, P. (2007). Social evaluation by preverbal infants. Nature, 450(7169), 557-559. Link to paper  (https://www.nature.com/articles/nature06288)
Schlingloff, Csibra, &amp;amp; Tatone, D. (2020). Do 15-month-old infants prefer helpers? A replication of Hamlin et al. (2007). Royal Society Open Science, 7(4), 1-7. Link to paper (https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/full/10.1098/rsos.191795) 
</description>
  <itunes:keywords>sociomoral evaluation, cognitive development</itunes:keywords>
  <content:encoded>
    <![CDATA[<p>Candy and Deon begin the episode by discussing their respective plans for teaching this fall. Specifically, they discuss whether they&#39;ll be teaching fully in person, fully remotely, or some combination of both. Note that since recording this episode, Deon has decided that he&#39;ll teach fully remotely—in the episode he was leaning toward a hyflex approach. In second segment, Candy and Deon discuss Kiley Hamlin&#39;s classic study on infants&#39; developing sociomoral evaluations as well as a recent replication attempt of the original study by Schlingloff, Csibra, and Tatone (2007). Candy and Deon also discuss whether the data reported in either the original study or replication attempt support the claim that infants possess a &quot;innate moral core&quot; (Hamlin, 2013). And in an episode first Candace and Deon actually disagree about something! Does this spell the end for this nascent podcast? </p>

<p>Links </p>

<p>Hamlin, J. K., Wynn, K., &amp; Bloom, P. (2007). Social evaluation by preverbal infants. Nature, 450(7169), 557-559. <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/nature06288" rel="nofollow">Link to paper </a><br>
Schlingloff, Csibra, &amp; Tatone, D. (2020). Do 15-month-old infants prefer helpers? A replication of Hamlin et al. (2007). Royal Society Open Science, 7(4), 1-7. <a href="https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/full/10.1098/rsos.191795" rel="nofollow">Link to paper</a></p>]]>
  </content:encoded>
  <itunes:summary>
    <![CDATA[<p>Candy and Deon begin the episode by discussing their respective plans for teaching this fall. Specifically, they discuss whether they&#39;ll be teaching fully in person, fully remotely, or some combination of both. Note that since recording this episode, Deon has decided that he&#39;ll teach fully remotely—in the episode he was leaning toward a hyflex approach. In second segment, Candy and Deon discuss Kiley Hamlin&#39;s classic study on infants&#39; developing sociomoral evaluations as well as a recent replication attempt of the original study by Schlingloff, Csibra, and Tatone (2007). Candy and Deon also discuss whether the data reported in either the original study or replication attempt support the claim that infants possess a &quot;innate moral core&quot; (Hamlin, 2013). And in an episode first Candace and Deon actually disagree about something! Does this spell the end for this nascent podcast? </p>

<p>Links </p>

<p>Hamlin, J. K., Wynn, K., &amp; Bloom, P. (2007). Social evaluation by preverbal infants. Nature, 450(7169), 557-559. <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/nature06288" rel="nofollow">Link to paper </a><br>
Schlingloff, Csibra, &amp; Tatone, D. (2020). Do 15-month-old infants prefer helpers? A replication of Hamlin et al. (2007). Royal Society Open Science, 7(4), 1-7. <a href="https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/full/10.1098/rsos.191795" rel="nofollow">Link to paper</a></p>]]>
  </itunes:summary>
</item>
  </channel>
</rss>
