<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" encoding="UTF-8" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:googleplay="http://www.google.com/schemas/play-podcasts/1.0" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:fireside="http://fireside.fm/modules/rss/fireside">
  <channel>
    <fireside:hostname>web01.fireside.fm</fireside:hostname>
    <fireside:genDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2026 18:44:04 -0500</fireside:genDate>
    <generator>Fireside (https://fireside.fm)</generator>
    <title>The It's Innate! Podcast - Episodes Tagged with “Associative Learning”</title>
    <link>https://itsinnate.fireside.fm/tags/associative%20learning</link>
    <pubDate>Sun, 19 Jan 2025 08:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
    <description>Two opinionated developmental cognitive scientists wax theoretical about how infants and children acquire knowledge!
</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type>
    <itunes:subtitle>A podcast by two developmental cognitive scientists</itunes:subtitle>
    <itunes:author>Deon Benton &amp; Jenny Wang</itunes:author>
    <itunes:summary>Two opinionated developmental cognitive scientists wax theoretical about how infants and children acquire knowledge!
</itunes:summary>
    <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/e/e7d55467-26ad-4d13-aa3b-ffe8a883b0bb/cover.jpg?v=1"/>
    <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
    <itunes:owner>
      <itunes:name>Deon Benton &amp; Jenny Wang</itunes:name>
      <itunes:email>theitsinnatepodcast@gmail.com</itunes:email>
    </itunes:owner>
<itunes:category text="Education"/>
<itunes:category text="Science">
  <itunes:category text="Social Sciences"/>
</itunes:category>
<itunes:category text="Society &amp; Culture">
  <itunes:category text="Philosophy"/>
</itunes:category>
<item>
  <title>Episode 24: People and objects are different, and infants innately know this. Or do they?</title>
  <link>https://itsinnate.fireside.fm/24</link>
  <guid isPermaLink="false">6bc53802-e125-4d4e-8b4d-14f53ccdbb85</guid>
  <pubDate>Sun, 19 Jan 2025 08:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
  <author>Deon Benton &amp; Jenny Wang</author>
  <enclosure url="https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/e7d55467-26ad-4d13-aa3b-ffe8a883b0bb/6bc53802-e125-4d4e-8b4d-14f53ccdbb85.mp3" length="86999178" type="audio/mpeg"/>
  <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
  <itunes:author>Deon Benton &amp; Jenny Wang</itunes:author>
  <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
  <itunes:duration>1:41:01</itunes:duration>
  <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
  <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/e/e7d55467-26ad-4d13-aa3b-ffe8a883b0bb/cover.jpg?v=1"/>
  <description>Deon and Jenny open this episode, which is a return their classic one-on-one format, by discussing the academic job market, imposter syndrome, and careful science. Following this brief discussion, Jenny and Deon discuss Deon's recent paper titled, "An associative-learning account of how infants learn about causal action in animates and inanimates: A critical reexamination of four classic studies." Deon talks about the motivation for writing this proposal as well as what his account is of how infants might begin to learn about how animates and inanimates differ from one another in terms of their causal abilities.  It will come as no surprise that Deon thinks that this knowledge is acquired, and that Jenny is a bit skeptical (although, as you'lll hear, there are signs that she may see the merit in Deon's argument). At a broad level, this episode has it all — we cover philosophy, computational modeling, mechanisms, and developmental science!
Links 
Benton, D. T. (2024). An associative-learning account of how infants learn about causal action in animates and inanimates: A critical reexamination of four classic studies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. Link (https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2025-27513-001)
</description>
  <itunes:keywords>associative learning, empiricism, nativism, mechanism, computational modeling</itunes:keywords>
  <content:encoded>
    <![CDATA[<p>Deon and Jenny open this episode, which is a return their classic one-on-one format, by discussing the academic job market, imposter syndrome, and careful science. Following this brief discussion, Jenny and Deon discuss Deon&#39;s recent paper titled, &quot;An associative-learning account of how infants learn about causal action in animates and inanimates: A critical reexamination of four classic studies.&quot; Deon talks about the motivation for writing this proposal as well as what his account is of how infants might begin to learn about how animates and inanimates differ from one another in terms of their causal abilities.  It will come as no surprise that Deon thinks that this knowledge is acquired, and that Jenny is a bit skeptical (although, as you&#39;lll hear, there are signs that she may see the merit in Deon&#39;s argument). At a broad level, this episode has it all — we cover philosophy, computational modeling, mechanisms, and developmental science!</p>

<p>Links </p>

<p>Benton, D. T. (2024). An associative-learning account of how infants learn about causal action in animates and inanimates: A critical reexamination of four classic studies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. <a href="https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2025-27513-001" rel="nofollow">Link</a></p>]]>
  </content:encoded>
  <itunes:summary>
    <![CDATA[<p>Deon and Jenny open this episode, which is a return their classic one-on-one format, by discussing the academic job market, imposter syndrome, and careful science. Following this brief discussion, Jenny and Deon discuss Deon&#39;s recent paper titled, &quot;An associative-learning account of how infants learn about causal action in animates and inanimates: A critical reexamination of four classic studies.&quot; Deon talks about the motivation for writing this proposal as well as what his account is of how infants might begin to learn about how animates and inanimates differ from one another in terms of their causal abilities.  It will come as no surprise that Deon thinks that this knowledge is acquired, and that Jenny is a bit skeptical (although, as you&#39;lll hear, there are signs that she may see the merit in Deon&#39;s argument). At a broad level, this episode has it all — we cover philosophy, computational modeling, mechanisms, and developmental science!</p>

<p>Links </p>

<p>Benton, D. T. (2024). An associative-learning account of how infants learn about causal action in animates and inanimates: A critical reexamination of four classic studies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. <a href="https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2025-27513-001" rel="nofollow">Link</a></p>]]>
  </itunes:summary>
</item>
  </channel>
</rss>
